The Theatre Royal, despite the fact that it focuses primarily on plays, did host its share of magicians. These magicians however did not perform singularly, they turned their art towards enhancing the plays being performed. Magic added to the plays being enjoyed. Often in newspapers advertising plays they would name the play and then state that it was being presented with illusion.13 Theatre goers were interested, not just in being told a story, but also in spectacle. In 1866 the manager of the Theatre Royal stated that, "people will not go where there is merely 'talking drama'; They will go where there is scenic effects and mechanical effects to please the eye. "14 Magical illusions went hand in hand with this idea of spectacle. For example they would portray ghosts using painting on glass and this was considered an interesting achievement for the theatre going public.15 Another magicians trick which was used often in the theatre was the trap door.16 The star trap, for example, was specifically made for appearances to be seen as magical and sprung to shoot the actor in the air from below stage.17 By the early 1900s the public had never seen anything on screen yet in a cinema so the effects of the illusions were even greater on them.18 One of the most impressive feats of illusion at the Theatre Royal was during its production of Ben Hur in 1902. For this play they succeeded in making real horses and chariots appear on stage, and yet not move. This was done through a complicated series of machinations, but for a long time the general public couldn't figure it out.19 These techniques were not credited as magic tricks, but were rather there to make the show better. However, the fact that the explanations were unknown and appeared magical drew in the crowds, and spurred an interest in seeing magical acts. Also, as the Theatre Royal was built in an aristocratic area and meant for aristocrats, this lead the interest in watching magical acts to spread to the upper classes of London.
1. Walter James Macqueen-Pope, Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. -- (London : Allen, [c1945], 1945), 14
2. Ibid.
3. Brian Dobbs, Drury Lane : Three Centuries of the Theatre Royal, 1663-1971. (London : Cassell, 1972., 1972), 4
4. Walter James Macqueen-Pope, Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. -- (London : Allen, [c1945], 1945), 16 and Brian Dobbs, Drury Lane : Three Centuries of the Theatre Royal, 1663-1971. (London : Cassell, 1972., 1972), 4
5. Brian Dobbs, Drury Lane : Three Centuries of the Theatre Royal, 1663-1971. (London : Cassell, 1972., 1972), 5
6. Walter James Macqueen-Pope, Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. -- (London : Allen, [c1945], 1945), 16
7. Ibid, 23
8. Ibid, 25
9. Johnson, 156
10. Ibid
11. Ibid
12. Walter James Macqueen-Pope, Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. -- (London : Allen, [c1945], 1945), 289
13. "THEATRE ROYAL DRURY-LANE." Morning Post, March 22, 1814. British Library Newspapers (accessed November 24, 2017). http://tinyurl.galegroup.com/tinyurl/5YmJ24.
14. Johnson, 157
15. Ibid, 158
16. Ibid, 160
17. Ibid, 159
18. Brian Dobbs, Drury Lane : Three Centuries of the Theatre Royal, 1663-1971. (London : Cassell, 1972., 1972), 166
19. Brian Dobbs, Drury Lane : Three Centuries of the Theatre Royal, 1663-1971. (London : Cassell, 1972., 1972), 168